This section of Support West Bend Schools will be used for updates regarding our School District funding, budget concerns and happenings at the State level. Please check back frequently!
In the upcoming weeks, the Wisconsin legislature’s Joint Committee on Finance will begin discussing and voting on the State Budget bill. They will be analyzing the budget line by line and suggesting changes as needed. On April 11, Ted Neitzke Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum and Instruction for the West Bend School District, testified at the public hearing for the Joint Committee on Finance. From the School District website, this is some of what he had to say:
“I am here to represent the Highest Return on Taxpayer Investment School District in the State of Wisconsin,” Neitzke said. “West Bend is a model school district for responsible spending. We are AA rated and are the lowest-spending school district of our size in the State of Wisconsin. We are nationally recognized, we have high ACT scores, deep programming and are recognized by the College Boards for our Advanced Placement offerings.”Neitzke asked the Joint Finance Committee to look seriously at responsible low-spending school districts like West Bend and provide the supportive tools needed to continue success for students. “We’re proud of our frugal reputation, we’re proud of our student achievement and we ask that you take the necessary steps to support responsible school districts like ours so that we don’t have to further reduce spending,” he said. “I ask that you look to make other school districts operate with the efficiencies we’ve discovered who spend more than $9,100/student before you ask us to spend less. Please find ways to reward the districts that have demonstrated responsibility. Find ways to give local school boards more flexibility, and find ways to allow fiscally responsible districts like West Bend to maintain their programs for students like we have.”
Our state senator Glenn Grothman is sponsoring a bill that would give a tax credit to parents of private and parochial students of between $1500-2500 per student. From the article:
The bill, authored by Sen. Glenn Grothman, R-West Bend, and Rep. Andre Jacque, R-Bellevue, would offer parents of first and ninth graders enrolling in parochial and private schools a non-refundable tax credit of $1,500 and $2,500 per student, respectively. The tax credits would be extended to second and 10th graders the following year, with additional grades added every subsequent year until all students are covered by 2021.
“With the government already subsidizing private education by up to $6,500 per year for Milwaukee residents, the proposal would offer assistance, albeit a lesser amount, for outstate parents who want an alternative to the public school for their children,” Grothman said.
Grothman said the proposal would save money because every time a person goes to a private school instead of a public school it saves the state around $10,000 a person.
He also said the bill would allow parents upset with their current school system another option.
“Whether their concerns are Wisconsin’s declining test scores, a radical new sex education program pushed through the Legislature last year or public school teachers proselytizing a liberal political agenda in their schools, it is unfair not to provide a little assistance to independent-minded parents,” Grothman said.
Grothman is proposing this tax credit when our state budget deficit is billions of dollars and with the proposed spending cuts of over $500 per public school student (that he supports). Our own district is looking at $3 million in cuts largely because of the budget proposal. So in this current situation of drastic education cuts throughout the state, how exactly does it make sense to be helping fund private schools? If there is this kind of money to give as a tax credit for private schools, then why isn’t it being used to help fund public education and reduce the proposed spending cuts?
The March 21st West Bend School Board meeting began outlining the programs and teachers on the chopping block for next year. From the Daily News:
The reductions, which include effectively 27 teaching positions and 14 coaches, bring the total number of staff eliminated since the 2008-09 school year to 72 teachers and 23 coaches. The district currently has 552 teachers.
“There is no one on the leadership team who takes this lightly,” said Superintendent Patricia Herdrich. “When facing reductions, challenging decisions have to be made. … It’s not desired, it’s because of the current state we are in.”
The financial hardship the district is facing is the result of a combination of factors, among them a stateimposed revenue limit that does not increase with the pace of district expenses.
“Think of revenue limits as a household income,” Herdrich said. “If your healthcare costs exceed your (income) you have to bring another portion of the household budget down.”
Factors that drive the district’s budget increases include utilities and energy costs, salary adjustments, special education services, fuel and transportation, and open enrollment — students who live in the district who attend school outside of it.
The preliminary budget assumes increases of 4.6 percent in utilities and telephone service and 2.5 percent in transportation.
Compounding matters, the district will be receiving $513 less in state aid per student than last year.
The district will be able to shift about half of the impact of the $6 million in reductions to employees, through Gov. Scott Walker’s budget repair bill. The remaining $3 million is coming from reductions in departmental budgets, staff and, in some cases, opportunities to students. The diving program, for example, is being completely eliminated at the high school level because participation is low.
This previous article further outlines the positions to be cut and which coaching positions are involved. It includes the last elementary librarian, a middle school librarian, 4 elementary teachers, 6 middle school teachers and 8 high school teachers.
Senator Glenn Grothman had this to say a few weeks ago: “As for the cuts to school aid, Grothman said area districts have no reason to panic. “I’ve been led to believe Gov. Walker made special provisions to take care of low-spending districts like West Bend,” he said. We’d like to know where those special provisions are and why a low spending district fiscally responsible district like West Bend is having to cut $3 million dollars while other wealthier and higher spending school districts are in many cases having to cut very little, if at all.
In other news, the district is further exploring the starting up of charter schools within the district which may help make up for funding lost thru declining open enrollment:
In an effort to retain approximately 100 students who transfer to virtual schools, taking with them about $6,800 in per-student revenues, West Bend will be launching its own online academy in fall, Neitzke said.
This summer and fall, the district will also be exploring three types of charter schools – a projectbased program, a blend of virtual and traditional schooling and a charter school at the elementary level.
In November, School Board members voted down a proposed charter school that would have operated independently of the district but required district funding. Neitzke said charters being explored would be administered by the district.
Governor Walker’s budget proposal plans to cut $834 million in education spending in Wisconsin, much it in the form of state aid. In addition, there will be an average per-pupil revenue limit reduction of about $555 so districts will not be able to offset the loss of state aid with property taxes.
This article from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel discusses details about the budget proposal. More details about the proposal can be found on the school district website front page, under “budget update”.
In recent years, school districts have had revenue cap increases of about $200/pupil which was a decrease from earlier in the decade. Despite allowing increased spending each year, the revenue caps were usually not enough for most districts to keep up with rising costs and this has resulted in programming cuts and staff reductions year after year. The new revenue cap decrease along with the significantly reduced state aid is a double whammy. The per pupil revenue loss is different for each district and is estimated to be $517/pupil for the West Bend School District. This article from the Journal Sentinel further explains the scenarios and has a short interview with West Bend School District Administrator Dr Pat Herdrich:
In setting the revenue limit decrease at a percentage instead of a dollar amount, Walker also ensured that lower revenue districts would not lose a greater percentage of revenue than wealthier districts, instead creating a range of losses linked to district spending.
According to information from the state Department of Public Instruction, the 5.5% revenue cap reduction would lead to losses that range from about $517 per student in the Mukwonago, Slinger and West Bend school district to $874 less per pupil in the Nicolet Union High School District. Milwaukee Public Schools is set to lose an amount near the state average: $556 per pupil.
The average per pupil cut in the four-county Milwaukee area is $599. Though her school system is losing less than that, West Bend School District Superintendent Patricia Herdrich said it also has less to lose than others.
“Obviously, because we’re a lower revenue district, we’ve already made significant cuts,” she said.
Even with the governor’s plan to have public employees pay 12% of their health care and 5.8% of their salaries toward their pension costs, Herdrich said her district still would likely come up nearly $4 million short.
“To take that hit programmatically, the impact is going to be significant for us if it plays out the way it’s going to.”
The changes to collective bargaining and increased contributions by teachers toward healthcare and pension are supposed to soften the blow, but the blow will still likely be huge. It is sounding like West Bend could be looking at reductions in the $3-4 million range, even after the provisions in the budget repair bill. However these numbers are still in flux and dependant on many variables. From the March 2 Daily News:
Since 1993, the state’s property tax limits have gradually risen to reflect increasing costs, and reducing them makes it more difficult for schools to make up the lost money.
“It’s essentially a double cut,” said West Bend School District Superintendent Patricia Herdrich. “There is a reduction in state aid of $500 per pupil and no ability to off-set the cost.”
Herdrich said in West Bend, the district could need to make as much as $6 million in programming reductions.
Districts would have more flexibility to react to the cuts, Walker said, if his budget repair bill eliminating most collective bargaining is passed.
In the West Bend School District, that would free up about $2.9 million.
Over the next several days, school officials will be working to get a better grasp on how exactly the individual districts will be impacted by the budget.
There will be budget presentations on the following dates to the School Board and any community that wants to attend:
Lynn Corazzi had a guest editorial in today’s Daily News speaking out against the charter school. With permission, we will post it in it’s entirety:
Not This Charter School, Not At This Time
Proposal Misses on Timing, Curriculum and Finances
Four members of the West Bend School Board made a common sense decision not enter into contract negotiations with Pastor Bruce Dunford of the First Baptist Church for Crossroads Academy, a proposed noninstrumentality charter school. Tim Stepanski, Randy Marquardt and Dave Weigand stumbled in their responsibilities as board members.
If negotiations had been approved, it is possible that the lowest-spending district in Wisconsin would be funding the state’s most expensive charter school. There were clear and compelling reasons for voting against the negotiations. They largely boil down to money.
1. Crossroads would be expensive. Under a plausible enrollment scenario for 100 students reviewed by the board, Crossroads would cost $7,701 per student and be one of the highest in Wisconsin. Only Milwaukee Public Schools’ noninstrumentality charter schools are higher at $7,775. Pastor Dunford agreed with the financial projections. In contrast, the full cost at Barton Elementary is $7,242 per student.
2. There was an ongoing net cost to the district. While revenue limits continue to drive program reductions and higher class sizes, Crossroads would be another ongoing drain on district resources. Pastor Dunford did not challenge this fact.
3. The proposed curriculum offered nothing innovative. During the 90-minute work session, Pastor Dunford offered little difference between the Crossroads’ curriculum and the West Bend School District’s, other than “the amount of emphasis to be placed on the founding historical roots, the history of Western civilization.”
4. The proposed curriculum was not complete and did not reflect state law. It included no world language, no art, no music and no special education. The administration demonstrated the curriculum was incomplete and Pastor Dunford did not dispute this conclusion. School Board members would have been irresponsible to enter into negotiations without knowing what they were buying. Writing curriculum acceptability as a contingency clause in a final contract to address this concern, as suggested by Pastor Dunford, should not be an acceptable alternative.
5. Starting negotiations would cost money now. The board would have committed to spending tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees to negotiate a multi-year contract for which the curriculum and full costs are unknown.
6. The proposal was being rushed. The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction has a recommended plan exceeding two years for starting a new charter school, including a grant process for a full year of research and curriculum development. Pastor Dunford was trying to get this done in months. None of the parties involved, including School Board members, could responsibly do their due diligence on this accelerated timeline.
Two board members who claim to be fiscal conservatives are prepared to spend money negotiating a school contract without knowing what would be taught or if it offered significant educational advantages over what is available in West Bend today. Stepanski previously vowed in the West Bend Daily News: “If it’s going to hurt the district I will not support it.” Yet despite the negative financial projections, he too voted for it.
It is ironic that three board members who continually indict the West Bend School District for spending too many taxpayer dollars now support a high cost charter school. While calling for ever greater accountability from the district, they are willing to turn control of more than $700,000 of taxpayer money to Pastor Dunford. This willingness comes at the expense of further program reductions and higher class sizes for the 7,000 students they are responsible for.
Pastor Dunford deserves credit for starting a conversation. Charter schools may, and perhaps should, have a place in West Bend. But not this one at this time. Taxpayers, educators and students deserve leadership from all board members on this issue.